Pro-Palestine Students Face Expulsion for Using a Bullhorn
Like other schools moving the goalposts, Swarthmore College recently changed its policies to ban “loud chanting.” The post Pro-Palestine Students Face Expulsion for Using a Bullhorn appeared first on The Intercept.
At Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania, 11 students stand accused by the administration of assaulting college staff during Palestine solidarity protests in the last year. Yet there wasn’t any pushing, grabbing, nor any kind of harmful touching.
The alleged assaults occurred, according to internal disciplinary charges, because some of the students used a bullhorn to amplify chants and slogans calling for the school to divest from Israel’s military-industrial complex.
The students, in other words, could face expulsion on assault charges for making a noise and amplifying it using, perhaps second only to the placard, the most standard of protest equipment.
“I feel like this is kind of a humiliation ritual, to make us apologize for protesting our college’s complicity.”
Swarthmore, a Quaker-founded private liberal arts college, prides itself on a legacy of promoting social justice. In the last year, however, the school has followed the trend throughout higher education in meeting protests against Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza with extraordinary repression.
In framing students as potential assault perpetrators for using a bullhorn, Swarthmore may even be raising the bar in punishing routine — even sometimes celebrated — protest activities.
“I feel like this is kind of a humiliation ritual, to make us apologize for protesting our college’s complicity and investment in genocide,” said Fatima, a Swarthmore senior and core organizer with the school’s chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, or SJP, who asked that her last name not be used for fear of online harassment. Fatima, among the students charged with assault for using a bullhorn, said, “It’s heinous and it’s ridiculous.”
A first-generation, low-income undergraduate, Fatima told me she feels she has been specifically targeted as a Arab Muslim student in a vulnerable economic circumstance. She said that many of the students facing disciplinary charges for their involvement in SJP are Black and brown.
“Swarthmore College is deeply committed to freedom of expression, including the freedom to protest and dissent peacefully,” said Alisa Giardinelli, the assistant vice president for communications at the college. “While we do not publicly discuss specific student conduct cases, I can confirm for you that in May, the college issued charge letters to students alleged to have violated a number of campus policies in the fall and early spring.”
The students, and the faculty defending them, attributed an uptick in disciplinary charges to a “Palestine exception” to free speech.
“According to our last recorded statistics, the college averaged 4.5 disciplinary charges a year — a figure that includes alcohol and substance use charges,” said three Swarthmore associate professors, Sangina Patnaik, Lara Cohen, and Ahmad Shokr, who are working as case managers for the students facing charges, in a statement. “This year the college is disciplining 25 pro-Palestine student activists. Twenty of them are students of color, and many are first-generation, low-income students.”
Giardinelli said both pro-Palestine and pro-Israel students had faced disciplinary charges. “To be clear,” she added, “neither race, socioeconomic standing, nor any other individual identity or status played a role in determining code of conduct violations.”
Along with nine of the other students, Fatima will attend a hearing on Wednesday over the assault charge and other charges including disorderly conduct and intimidation. The charges stemmed from a small protest last December: Ten students interrupted an on-campus dinner held for the college’s board of managers.
The students carried posters, including photographs commemorating Palestinians recently slaughtered by Israel; they had one bullhorn among them, which some of the students used to call out their divestment demands. The dinner attendees responded to the protest by leaving, driven away in a shuttle bus as demonstrators followed them out and continued a small rally outside.
Another student also faces assault charges for using a bullhorn at a separate pro-divestment protest outside the school’s dining center in February.
The charges are all internal to the school, not criminal, but could lead to sanctions including expulsion.
“The Same Tactics”
Swarthmore is not an outlier. For a year, universities around the country have been treating the most archetypal of free speech — protest activity — as a threat to community safety, worthy of grave sanctions, and, in many cases, aggressive police involvement too.
The bullhorn-related assault charges are the latest example of the absurd lengths school administrators will now go to paint pro-Palestinian activism as harmful and violent, no matter how unremarkable the protest actions in question.
“And at no point did I think that I was jeopardizing my education, because of the long history of social justice protest at Swarthmore,” said another student facing bullhorn-related assault and other disciplinary charges for their participation in the December protest. The student asked The Intercept to withhold their name for fear of retaliation from the college.
“The South African Anti-Apartheid Movement, organizing for survivors, the Black Lives Matter movement, all of these movements, all of these movements used the same tactics that we did,” said the student. “Sit-ins, occupying administrative offices, interrupting meetings and board of managers, and using bullhorns inside and outside. And to my knowledge, none of these groups and none of the individuals in these groups have ever faced disciplinary charges like we have.”
Following the disruption of the board of managers dinner in December, the students were told that attendees at the dinner complained of ear pain and hearing loss after the event, and that one person had sought medical attention because of the bullhorn noise.
“None of these groups and none of the individuals in these groups have ever faced disciplinary charges like we have.”
“We asked for the medical records of this specific person who alleges that they had to seek medical attention. They did not give it to us,” Fatima told me. (Students are not permitted to bring legal representation to their disciplinary hearings.)
Giardinelli, the Swarthmore spokesperson, said, “The cases that fall under alleged major misconduct violations include instances in which community members had to seek medical attention as a result of the actions of some students. Due to privacy concerns, I’m unable to say more about that.”
Swarthmore hired an outside law firm, Montgomery McCracken, to investigate the incident. None of the students facing disciplinary charges were interviewed by the law firm for their investigation, which was instead based on the school’s CCTV footage, testimony from dinner attendees, and reports from the school’s Public Safety staff.
“The College has previously hired outside investigators and external professionals with higher education and student conduct experience to investigate and review issues related to student conduct,” said Giardinelli, who added that lawyers hired as investigators do not act as legal counsel. “We also used an outside investigator after student protests in the spring of 2019.” (Montgomery McCracken did not respond to a request for comment.)
Fatima said the school’s provost, Tomoko Sakomura, grabbed her by the arm at the dinner protest, attempting to take the bullhorn from her hands.
Decibel Levels
The school’s code of conduct includes under “assault” an action which “any reasonable person under the circumstances would know, places oneself or another at risk of bodily harm” — the harm need not be realized to incur disciplinary action, but there were allegations injuries suffered in these incidents.
The student facing charges who requested anonymity said that, according to their research, speakers for parties at campus spaces had a higher decibel level.
According to the students and the faculty case managers who have been supporting them, once they learned of the assault claim, they checked the decibel levels of the bullhorns used against guides from Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
The students say they did not use the bullhorn at its highest volume setting when indoors, but that even if they had, OSHA guidelines suggest workers can be safely exposed to that level of noise — 105 decibels — for up to an hour per day. The indoor dinner protest lasted less than 30 minutes.
“For my case, the main thing I would say is that the assault allegation is especially egregious because the only evidence they are using against me is public safety testimony,” said Adi, a sophomore SJP organizer who asked The Intercept to withhold his last name for fear of online harassment. Adi is facing assault charges for directing a bullhorn at a public safety officer standing nearby at a February protest. The officer then reportedly sought medical attention for ringing ears in the following days.
“There are no videos, no pictures, and no confirmation that I used the bullhorn in the way the college is alleging,” Adi said. “Only testimony from other officers who claim I was trying to use it for harm.”
Swarthmore, like other colleges across the country, spent the last months revising student and faculty conduct guidelines in ways critics say are aimed at silencing pro-Palestine action and groundlessly demonizing anti-Israel protest as antisemitic.
Patnaik, Cohen, and Shokr, the Swarthmore faculty members supporting the students, said that among the new policies at the college was a ban on “among other things, musical instruments and ‘loud chanting’ indoors.”
“The Student Handbook and Student Code of Conduct is updated each year,” Giardinelli, the Swarthmore spokesperson, said. “The 2024-25 updates now include examples to help students understand behavior that becomes prohibited when it disrupts campus and community operations, classes, or activities.”
In their statement, the professors said, “These newly repressive measures show that colleges and universities are willing to compromise central tenets of higher education — truth-seeking, intellectual inquiry, and free speech — for the foreseeable future in order to silence pro-Palestine activism.”
The post Pro-Palestine Students Face Expulsion for Using a Bullhorn appeared first on The Intercept.
What's Your Reaction?
