Michael Madigan accused of engaging in a "campaign of bribery" as his corruption trial finally begins
Federal prosecutors accused Michael Madigan of engaging in a "campaign of bribery" as the former Illinois House speaker's racketeering conspiracy trial finally got underway Monday afternoon following a lengthy jury selection process."This is a case about corruption at the highest levels of state government," Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Streicker said, gesturing at Madigan as he looked way.Madigan wore a dark suit, white shirt and red tie as he sat at the head of the defense table near the judge's dais, where he's watched two weeks of jury selection. His co-defendant, Michael McClain, sat in the middle of his table, farther from the jury box."McClain was Madigan's mouthpiece," Streicker told the jurors. "McClain carried messages for Madigan. … Together, the defendants engaged in a campaign of bribery."She said the bribes took the form of jobs for Madigan's allies and business for his law firm. "This was the defendants' racket," she said. "The corruption of public office for private gain. This racket went on for years."The Southwest Side Democrat’s corruption trial is the most significant to play out at the Dirksen Federal Courthouse since the trials of ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich. The FBI has pursued Madigan — one of the most powerful politicians in Illinois history — for more than a decade. The probe forced him from power in 2021.Prosecutors say Madigan led a criminal enterprise — made up of his public office, political organization and private tax law firm — designed to enhance his political power and enrich his allies and associates. The allegations in a 117-page indictment span five separate schemes.McClain is a former lawmaker and lobbyist who had once developed a reputation in Springfield as Madigan’s messenger. He has since been convicted of scheming to bribe Madigan, and he is now charged with additional crimes."McClain and Madigan were very close," Streicker said in court Monday. "So close that McClain acted as Madigan's agent. McClain … was a self-described 'soldier' and surrogate for Madigan."McClain handled Madigan's dirty work," she said, a role that McClain "relished."Madigan and McClain were longtime friends, but this is the fourth criminal trial to examine their relationship. Since it officially began on Oct. 8, there’s been little interaction between the two, even though they’ve been seated just feet away from each other.The trial is playing out in the 12th-floor courtroom of U.S. District Judge John Blakey, a former prosecutor whose father famously wrote the racketeering law being used to prosecute Madigan. Last week he showed frustration with the pace of jury selection — which took twice as long as he expected — and he pushed for opening statements to get underway Monday.The panel of eight women and four men ultimately chosen to hear the case includes a nurse who enjoys Marvel movies, a woman who works at a Goodwill donation center, and a painter who works in acrylics and lives in the 19th Ward.The trial is expected to last until mid-December. Jurors could hear from as many as 50 witnesses once opening statements are complete. Most notable among them will be Danny Solis, the veteran City Council member who prosecutors have called one of Chicago’s “most significant cooperators in the last several decades.”Solis famously turned on Madigan and other powerful politicians in 2016 by wearing an FBI wire to avoid prison. He helped the feds prosecute the now-imprisoned former Ald. Edward M. Burke. Solis also testified during Burke’s trial, but only after being called to the stand by Burke’s defense attorneys.One of the earliest witnesses in Madigan’s case could be Alaina Hampton, whose claims of sexual harassment by a Madigan aide rocked Springfield in 2018 and threatened Madigan’s grip on power at the time.Neither Madigan nor McClain are accused of any sexual misconduct. However, prosecutors will likely use Hampton’s testimony to bolster their claims of a racketeering enterprise.McClain told Madigan he’d arranged for monthly payments to be sent to the aide who’d been accused by Hampton and then lost his job, prosecutors allege. Madigan knew about the aide’s conduct because Hampton had reported it directly to the speaker, according to the feds.Evidence in two of the five schemes alleged in Madigan’s indictment has already been aired in various courtrooms. For example, Madigan is charged for his role in the scheme at issue in last year’s ComEd bribery trial, which led to McClain’s earlier conviction.Jurors in that case heard that five Madigan allies were paid $1.3 million by ComEd over eight years in a bid to influence Madigan. Also convicted in that trial were ex-ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore, former ComEd lobbyist John Hooker and onetime City Club President Jay Doherty.Another jury heard last month that one Madigan ally was paid an additional $22,500 by AT&T Illinois in a separate alleged scheme aimed at Madigan.Former AT&T Illinois President Paul La Schiazza went to trial for his alleged role in th
Federal prosecutors accused Michael Madigan of engaging in a "campaign of bribery" as the former Illinois House speaker's racketeering conspiracy trial finally got underway Monday afternoon following a lengthy jury selection process.
"This is a case about corruption at the highest levels of state government," Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Streicker said, gesturing at Madigan as he looked way.
Madigan wore a dark suit, white shirt and red tie as he sat at the head of the defense table near the judge's dais, where he's watched two weeks of jury selection. His co-defendant, Michael McClain, sat in the middle of his table, farther from the jury box.
"McClain was Madigan's mouthpiece," Streicker told the jurors. "McClain carried messages for Madigan. … Together, the defendants engaged in a campaign of bribery."
She said the bribes took the form of jobs for Madigan's allies and business for his law firm. "This was the defendants' racket," she said. "The corruption of public office for private gain. This racket went on for years."
The Southwest Side Democrat’s corruption trial is the most significant to play out at the Dirksen Federal Courthouse since the trials of ex-Gov. Rod Blagojevich. The FBI has pursued Madigan — one of the most powerful politicians in Illinois history — for more than a decade. The probe forced him from power in 2021.
Prosecutors say Madigan led a criminal enterprise — made up of his public office, political organization and private tax law firm — designed to enhance his political power and enrich his allies and associates. The allegations in a 117-page indictment span five separate schemes.
McClain is a former lawmaker and lobbyist who had once developed a reputation in Springfield as Madigan’s messenger. He has since been convicted of scheming to bribe Madigan, and he is now charged with additional crimes.
"McClain and Madigan were very close," Streicker said in court Monday. "So close that McClain acted as Madigan's agent. McClain … was a self-described 'soldier' and surrogate for Madigan.
"McClain handled Madigan's dirty work," she said, a role that McClain "relished."
Madigan and McClain were longtime friends, but this is the fourth criminal trial to examine their relationship. Since it officially began on Oct. 8, there’s been little interaction between the two, even though they’ve been seated just feet away from each other.
The trial is playing out in the 12th-floor courtroom of U.S. District Judge John Blakey, a former prosecutor whose father famously wrote the racketeering law being used to prosecute Madigan. Last week he showed frustration with the pace of jury selection — which took twice as long as he expected — and he pushed for opening statements to get underway Monday.
The panel of eight women and four men ultimately chosen to hear the case includes a nurse who enjoys Marvel movies, a woman who works at a Goodwill donation center, and a painter who works in acrylics and lives in the 19th Ward.
The trial is expected to last until mid-December. Jurors could hear from as many as 50 witnesses once opening statements are complete. Most notable among them will be Danny Solis, the veteran City Council member who prosecutors have called one of Chicago’s “most significant cooperators in the last several decades.”
Solis famously turned on Madigan and other powerful politicians in 2016 by wearing an FBI wire to avoid prison. He helped the feds prosecute the now-imprisoned former Ald. Edward M. Burke. Solis also testified during Burke’s trial, but only after being called to the stand by Burke’s defense attorneys.
One of the earliest witnesses in Madigan’s case could be Alaina Hampton, whose claims of sexual harassment by a Madigan aide rocked Springfield in 2018 and threatened Madigan’s grip on power at the time.
Neither Madigan nor McClain are accused of any sexual misconduct. However, prosecutors will likely use Hampton’s testimony to bolster their claims of a racketeering enterprise.
McClain told Madigan he’d arranged for monthly payments to be sent to the aide who’d been accused by Hampton and then lost his job, prosecutors allege. Madigan knew about the aide’s conduct because Hampton had reported it directly to the speaker, according to the feds.
Evidence in two of the five schemes alleged in Madigan’s indictment has already been aired in various courtrooms. For example, Madigan is charged for his role in the scheme at issue in last year’s ComEd bribery trial, which led to McClain’s earlier conviction.
Jurors in that case heard that five Madigan allies were paid $1.3 million by ComEd over eight years in a bid to influence Madigan. Also convicted in that trial were ex-ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore, former ComEd lobbyist John Hooker and onetime City Club President Jay Doherty.
Another jury heard last month that one Madigan ally was paid an additional $22,500 by AT&T Illinois in a separate alleged scheme aimed at Madigan.
Former AT&T Illinois President Paul La Schiazza went to trial for his alleged role in that scheme, but a jury failed to reach a verdict in that case. A new trial has not been scheduled.
Finally, Madigan is charged for his role in three alleged schemes involving Solis, in which prosecutors say Madigan tried to squeeze developers for business for his private law firm, Madigan & Getzendanner.
They involved an apartment project in Solis’ ward at Sangamon Street and Washington Boulevard, a Chinatown parking lot at Cermak Road and Wentworth Avenue, and the Old Post Office that sits over the Eisenhower Expressway.
What's Your Reaction?
