ETH’s Security Debate: Exploring the Impact on Ethereum’s Price and Community

• The U.S. SEC’s consideration of classifying Ethereum (ETH) as a security alongside XRP has cast uncertainty over the approval of the spot Ethereum ETF.
• Market veterans, including ex-CFTC Commissioner Brian Quintenz and Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, have defended Ethereum against the SEC’s classification efforts.

While the Ethereum community has been eagerly awaiting the approval of the spot Ethereum ETF from the U.S. SEC, there’s an interesting twist in the tale. As per the latest reports, the SEC has intensified its efforts in classifying it as a ‘security’. This means that along with XRP, the SEC is now keen to give Ether a ‘security tag’.

Post the approval of the spot Bitcoin ETF back in January 2024, the SEC has been under immense pressure from lawmakers asking the agency not to approve any crypto funds. Thus, the odds of spot Ethereum ETF approval have also been dwindling, reports Crypto News Flash.

Giving a ‘security’ tag to a cryptocurrency means that it will be subject to strict trading regulations. This can also limit retail participation as it involves major paperwork with limitations in buying and selling the asset class.

From a technical standpoint, Ethereum’s classification as a security influences its exchange listings and investor accessibility. Consequently, some exchanges may consider delisting or relocating ETH to platforms designed for securities trading. As reported by Crypto News Flash, the Ethereum Foundation is already under investigation amid an inquiry by the State Authority.

Yet, Ethereum’s decentralized nature poses challenges in enforcing such regulations, particularly on a global scale. Even if the SEC imposes restrictions, individuals outside the U.S. could still engage in Ethereum trading. This loophole extends to U.S. citizens, who may seek alternative means to continue trading despite regulatory barriers.

Market Veterans Defend Ethereum Against SEC Attack

Ex-CFTC Commission Brian Quintenz has challenged the SEC’s narrative of classifying Ethereum as a ‘security’.

Brian Quintenz stated that when the SEC permitted the trading of ETH Futures ETFs on regulated security exchanges, it explicitly recognized Ethereum (ETH) as a non-security asset beyond its jurisdiction. Quintenz highlighted that if ETH were classified as a security, the ETH Futures ETF would be deemed illegal. He emphasized that the SEC cannot sanction the trading of an illegal instrument on national securities exchanges.

Quintenz expressed interest in observing the rationale the SEC would provide if it were to delay or reject an ETH ETF, given its prior acknowledgment of ETH’s status. He also criticized the SEC’s failure to acknowledge these facts, suggesting that it leads to confusion and detriment to the public.

5/ It will be interesting to watch what, if any, excuse the SEC uses if it were to delay or deny an ETH ETF given it has already informed the market on ETH being outside its jurisdiction.

— Brian Quintenz (@BrianQuintenz) March 20, 2024

Additionally, Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, tackled persistent speculation and misinformation regarding Ethereum (ETH).

He reaffirmed that ETH has been acknowledged as a commodity by both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), with senior SEC officials and former Chair Gary Gensler confirming its non-security status.

Ex. A. Senior SEC officials have said ETH is not a security, see e.g. SEC Director of Corporation Finance Hinman’s statement https://t.co/efXqCx4iyw 3/10

— paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) March 20, 2024

Grewal emphasized that ETH’s categorization stands apart from the traditional Howey test employed to ascertain securities. He also pointed out that ETH does not fall within the definition of an investment contract or security under this criteria.